California State Legislature   Constitution of California
California Department of Fish and Game    

 

2008 Legislation

 

SB 1424 TEXT in PDF

An act to repeal and add Section 2118 of the Fish and Game Code, relating to wild animals.

legislative counsel’s digest
SB 1424, as introduced, Machado. Wild animals: permits. Existing law prohibits the importation, transportation, possession, or live release of specified wild animals, except under a revocable, nontransferable permit. Existing law permits the Fish and Game Commission, by regulation, and in cooperation with the Department of Food and Agriculture, to add or delete wild animals from the list of specified wild animals. This bill would modify the list of wild animals by adding and deleting specified wild animals from that list.

 

VIDEO: The Propaganda Behind The Pet Extinction Bills

 

California Initiatives regarding animals in MSDOC and PDF files

 

We the People for Pets: Urgent Call to Action flyers: Version 1   Version 2   Version 3

 

   Animal Property Act      Animal License Law  Property Protection Act Freedom From Sterilization Act     Farm Animal Protection Act No Kill Bill RFID Act

 

Declaration of Circulator PDF file

Instructions in MSDOC and PDF files

 

California Law provides very strict guidelines on obtaining valid initiative petition signatures. Signatures that are improperly collected will be invalid and will not be counted. Please follow directions carefully.

GENERAL RULES

§ All signatures on a petition must be by REGISTERED VOTERS of the SAME County that is designated on both sides of the petition. Use separate petitions for each different county.
§ Print your name and residence address, exactly as you are registered to vote on the top line.
§ Sign your signature underneath your printed name, and print the name of the city in which you live and your zip code. Registration cards are available for free at the USPS & County Elections office.
§ Fill out completely the section entitled: DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR at the bottom of the petition form.
§ That includes printing the circulator's full name, the same name used when the circulator registered to vote, the county of their residence, the address where the circulator is registered to vote and the dates between which the signatures were gathered.
§ When all the signatures are gathered, the circulator should sign the bottom of this section; and then write in the date and location of signing.

MAIL BACK TO: We The People Pets, 160 10th Street, San Francisco, CA 94103-2618
For questions: (650) 296-2169 wethepeople2007@gmail.com


1292. (07-0060)
Property Ownership. Constitutional Amendment.
Summary Date: 11/21/07 Circulation Deadline: 04/21/08 Signatures Required: 694,354
Proponent: Richard Byrd
Amends California Constitution to declare that governmental entities within California, including cities and counties, may not make any law or ordinance that prevents any citizen from owning or legally acquiring property, or that limits the amount of property one may acquire, grow, produce, or own. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: The fiscal effect of this measure cannot be determined, as it would depend largely on how the measureʼs terms are interpreted by the courts and implemented by government. (Initiative 07-0060.) (Full Text)

1294. (07-0062)
Recognition of Animals as Property. Constitutional Amendment.
Summary Date: 11/21/07 Circulation Deadline: 04/21/08 Signatures Required: 694,354
Proponent: Jill Holt (951) 541-1669
Amends California Constitution to declare that all animals owned by citizens, including pets and animals used for agricultural purposes, are property. Prohibits enactment or enforcement of any law that would characterize privately-owned animals as anything other than property. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: Probably no fiscal effect on state and local governments. (Initiative 07-0062.) (Full Text)

1295. (07-0063)
Prohibition on Required or Coerced Sterilization of Animals or Humans. Constitutional Amendment.
Summary Date: 11/21/07 Circulation Deadline: 04/21/08 Signatures Required: 694,354
Proponent: Dianne-Margaret Hedgcock
Prohibits enactment or enforcement of any law requiring or coercing by any means, including financial penalty, sexual sterilization of any human or animal. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: Short-term savings to local governments because of the elimination of spay and neuter enforcement and surgery costs, offset in the long-term by unknown, but potentially significant, increased costs to operate shelters and provide animal control services to an increased dog and cat population. Unknown, but potentially significant loss of local government animal control revenue, because jurisdictions will no longer be able to charge a higher license or adoption fee for unaltered animals than for animals that are spayed or neutered. Potential avoidance of state costs of a few tens of thousands of dollars annually associated with the prohibition of chemical castration of certain prisoners upon their parole. (Initiative 07-0063.) (Full Text)

 

2007 Legislation

 

REXANO opposes AB 1634 (please note the AB 1634 is dead for now, we are just leaving this info her so you can learn the background on this bill as it might be reintroduced)
 

REXANO joins other pro animal groups in opposing AB 1634, so called ‘California Healthy Pets Act’. June 11, 2007 FREE posters

 

California's problems are everyone's problems  April 2007- Editorial

 

GRAPHS showing California Shelter data

 

California is proposing an extreme spay/neuter bill AB 1634,  even though facts clearly show there is no factual need to introduce another tax money wasting and property rights infringing animal rights (AR) bill that will only punish responsible animal breeders and pet owners. Furthermore, the table clearly shows the facts; even though the human population increased from 1995, the actual/real number of euthanized animals decreased. This translates to 1.5 decrease of animal euthanasia rate per person. In 1995, the rate was 0.019 animal euthanized per CA state resident, in 2005 the rate was 0.012, 1.5 times less. This clearly shows no need for another anti pet anti breeder spay/neuter law in California.
Large number of animals are feral cats as documented by LA Animal Services Kill Rate Report and this bill will do nothing to fix them.

 

Table: California State dog and cat euthanasia 1995-2005

 

Year Total Euthanized *Dogs (36% of Total) *Cats (64% of Total, includes feral cats; 43% of this were neonate orphaned kittens) California human population Number of euthanized animals per person
1995  603,806 217,370  386,436 31,589,000 0.019114
2005  430,240 154,886  275,354 34,441,000 0.012492
Change -173,566  -62,484 -111,082 +2,852,000 1.54 DECREASE of number of euthanized animals per person


Source: Euthanasia data submitted to California assembly by cahealthypets.com, US Census Bureau,
*cats vs.dogs breakdown estimates based on LA animal services statistical data of what percentage of total were dogs and cats in their shelter


Wild and exotic animal legislation:

 

MEASURE : A.B. No. 450
AUTHOR(S) : Strickland.
TOPIC : Wild animal facilities: inspection.
LAST HIST. ACT. DATE: 02/26/2007
LAST HIST. ACTION : Referred to Com. on W.,P. & W.
COMM. LOCATION : ASM WATER, PARKS AND WILDLIFE
HEARING DATE : 04/18/2007
TITLE : An act to amend Section 2150.4 of the Fish and Game
Code, relating to fish and game.

HTML TEXT

PDF TEXT

 

 

MEASURE : S.B. No. 880
AUTHOR(S) : Calderon.
TOPIC : Crime.
HOUSE LOCATION : SEN
LAST HIST. ACT. DATE: 03/29/2007
LAST HIST. ACTION : Hearing postponed by committee. Set for hearing May 8.
COMM. LOCATION : SEN NATURAL RESOURCES AND WATER
HEARING DATE : 05/08/2007
TITLE : An act to amend Section 653o of the Penal Code, relating
to crime.

HTML TEXT

PDF TEXT

<snip>

SECTION 1. Section 653o of the Penal Code is amended to read:
653o. (a) It is unlawful to import into this state for commercial
purposes, to possess with intent to sell, or to sell within the
state, the dead body, or any part or product thereof, of any polar
bear, leopard, ocelot, tiger, cheetah, jaguar, sable antelope, wolf
(Canis lupus), zebra, whale, cobra, python, sea turtle, colobus
monkey, kangaroo, vicuna, sea otter, free-roaming feral horse,
dolphin or porpoise (Delphinidae), Spanish lynx, or elephant.
(b) Commencing January 1, 2010, it shall be unlawful to import
into this state for commercial purposes, to possess with intent to
sell, or to sell within the state, the dead body, or any part or
product thereof, of any crocodile or alligator.

(c) For purposes of this section, "kangaroo" means those species
of kangaroo that are included under either of the following:

(1) The federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. Sec.
1531 et seq.).
(2) The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of
Wild Fauna and Flora, signed on March 3, 1973, 27 U.S.T. 1087 and
its appendices.

<SNIP>

 

MEASURE : A.B. No. 777
AUTHOR(S) : Levine.
TOPIC : Animal cruelty: elephants.
HOUSE LOCATION : ASM
LAST HIST. ACT. DATE: 03/15/2007
LAST HIST. ACTION : Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and A.,E.,S.,T., & I.M.
COMM. LOCATION : ASM PUBLIC SAFETY
COMM. ACTION DATE : 04/17/2007
COMM. ACTION : Set, first hearing. Hearing cancelled at the request of
author.
HEARING DATE : 04/17/2007
TITLE : An act to amend Section 596.5 of the Penal Code,
relating to animal cruelty.

HTML TEXT

PDF TEXT